Account of Profits on Convoyed Goods in a Claim for Patent Infringement

In a recent High Court matter which the author was lead counsel on, an interesting and novel legal issue arose on whether the plaintiff was entitled to claim for an account of profits from the sale of convoyed goods. The High Court considered our legal submissions and accepted the legal principles on this issue.

Read More
Dispute Resolution Layers Dispute Resolution Layers

Case Update: Trade Mark Application by Megaport (Services) Pty Ltd and opposition by Singapore Telecommunications Limited [2018] SGIPOS 17

Megaport (Services) Pty Ltd (“the Applicant”), a telecommunication service provider, applied for registration of a subject mark, “MEGAPORT”. The application mark was accepted and published for opposition purposes. Singapore Telecommunications Limited (“the Opponent”) then opposed the registration. The Opponent argued that their earlier marks (“Opponent’s Earlier Marks”) are similar to the application mark.

Read More
Dispute Resolution Layers Dispute Resolution Layers

Case Update: Lee Tat Development Pte Ltd v Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 301 [2018] SGCA 50 - Court of Appeal holds no tort of abuse of process and no malicious prosecution.

This appeal concerned the outcome of a lengthy dispute between the management corporation of a condominium, Grange Heights (the “MCST”) and owners of an adjacent plot of land, Lee Tat Development Pte Ltd (“Lee Tat”). The dispute was over a strip of land owned by Lee Tat, used as a shortcut by residents of Grange Heights to access Grange Road and Orchard Road easily.  The Court of Appeal held in 2008 (overruling their previous decision in 2005) that the residents of Grange Heights did not have an easement over the strip of land. Following the 2008 decision, Lee Tat then sued the condominium’s MCST, claiming damages for (1) malicious prosecution for two prior suits to assert the easement (2) abuse of process for four prior actions (3) expressing malicious falsehoods (4) trespass on Lee Tat’s property by continuing to access the shortcut until the Court of Appeal held in 2008 that the condominium residents were not entitled to access.

Read More
Dispute Resolution Layers Dispute Resolution Layers

Case Update: ULU v. ULT [2018] SGFC 45 - Family Court clarifies application of 3-year time bar on enforcement of child maintenance orders

When maintenance sums for children fall due, are there any time restrictions on applications to enforce them through the court system? In ULU v. ULT [2018] SGFC 45, the Family Court emphasised that the statutory 3-year time bar in section 121(3) of the Women’s Charter does not apply to applications to enforce child maintenance orders. The court also considered other issues, including the determination of the terms of an agreement made via email.

Read More
Dispute Resolution Layers Dispute Resolution Layers

Case Update: Gao Shuchao v Tan Kok Quan [2018] SGHC 115 - High Court Clarifies Law on Qualified Privilege and Overturns Finding of Defamation​​​​​​​

In the District Court (“DC”), the Appellant, a Singapore Management University law professor, was ordered to pay $120,000 in total damages after defaming the three Respondents during an Annual General Meeting (“AGM”) of the management corporation (“MC”) of the Duchess Residences in the Bukit Timah area.

Read More

Case Update: Ang Ai Tee v Resource Credit [2017] SGHC 159 - Statutory Demand For Sum In Respect Of Loan Refinancing Transactions Set Aside

In the recent case of Ang Ai Tee v Resource Credit [2017] SGHC 159, the High Court upheld the appeal of a plaintiff borrower who sought to set aside a statutory demand for the sum of $135,879.96, which was issued by the defendant licensed moneylender pursuant to a series of refinancing transactions introduced by the defendant. At the crux of this case was the refinancing scheme in which the defendant imposed a 10% administrative fee for every loan refinancing arrangement.

Read More
Dispute Resolution Layers Dispute Resolution Layers

Case Update: BOK v BOL [2017] SGHC 316 - Singapore High Court sets aside trust on grounds of misrepresentation, mistake, undue influence and unconscionability, construes scope of living trust

On the evening of 26 March 2014 (which was 3 days after the funeral of his mother who was killed tragically), the Plaintiff, who was then 29 years old, signed a declaration of trust (“DOT”), which purported to constitute him and his wife (the 2nd Defendant) as joint trustees of all his assets for the sole benefit of their infant son (the 1st Defendant). Pf then sought to set aside the DOT, which had been drafted and presented to him by the 2nd Defendant. Before the 2nd Defendant stopped working in 2012, she had been a practising lawyer for four years before spending two years in the banking industry.

Read More
Dispute Resolution Layers Dispute Resolution Layers

Case Update: Major Shipping & Trading Inc v Standard Chartered Bank (Singapore) Ltd [2018] SGHC 04 - Claim against bank for making unauthorised transactions by fraudster fails

Singapore High Court construes "good faith" in banking standard terms in the context of unauthorised fund transfers, finds that circumstances were not sufficient to put a reasonable banker on suspicion regarding unauthorised transfers, and finds on reasonableness of exclusion clauses under the unfair contract terms act.

Read More